The LibraryThe Godhead, Baptism, History

Oneness Theology: A Working Compendium

A short but complete map of Oneness theology: the one God of Israel, manifested in flesh as Jesus Christ. It works through the Hebrew and Greek of the key Old and New Testament texts, the typology of the angel, the tabernacle and the priesthood, and the apostolic practice of baptism in Jesus’ name. Each contested text is set beside the strongest Trinitarian reading before it is answered.

Introduction

Oneness theology confesses that the God of Israel is absolutely one, and that this one God has made himself known as Father, in the Son and as the Holy Spirit without being three persons. Jesus Christ is not the second member of a divine company. He is God “manifest in the flesh” (), the man in whom “dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily” (). This is the historic faith of Oneness Apostolic (Oneness Pentecostal) churches, and this compendium states it, tests it against the text and defends it.

It begins where Jesus began: “Hear, O Israel; The Lord our God is one Lord” (, quoting ). The scribe drew the plain conclusion: “there is one God; and there is none other but he” ().

What Oneness theology holds

  1. God is one, in the ordinary sense of the word: one God, with no other beside him (; ).
  2. Father, Son and Holy Spirit are real, but they are not three persons. They name the one God as Father in his transcendence (), as Son in the incarnation () and as Holy Spirit in his activity and indwelling ().
  3. Jesus is the one God manifested in flesh, fully God and fully man (). His deity is the Father dwelling in him (); his humanity is the Son.
  4. The Son is the incarnation, not an eternally begotten second person. Scripture dates the Son’s begetting (; ) and never speaks of an “eternal Son.”
  5. Jesus is the revealed name of the one God, the name by which we are saved () and the name invoked in baptism for the remission of sins ().

Critics call this modalism. Oneness writers share the early monarchians’ conviction that God is numerically one, but they do not teach that God is Father, Son and Spirit only in sequence. At the Jordan, the voice from heaven, the Spirit descending like a dove and the man in the water were the one God revealing himself at once ()1.

Why a compendium

This is a working compendium: a short but complete map of the case, meant to be kept open beside a Bible, and the spine of the Academy path The Godhead. It traces the line from promise to fulfilment to apostolic practice, and it states the strongest Trinitarian reading of each contested text before answering it. Longer studies go deeper: Isaiah 9:6 and the Child Who Is Mighty God, YHWH in the Flesh, The Name in the Water and Ten Objections to Oneness, Answered.

How the evidence is read

  1. Hebrew. Old Testament words are read in the Masoretic Text with the standard lexicon2, with Strong’s numbers for further study3. English verse numbers are used ( is 9:5 in Hebrew Bibles).
  2. Greek. New Testament words are read with the standard lexicon4. Where the Textus Receptus behind the King James Version differs from critical editions, the difference is noted.
  3. Typology. The angel of the LORD, the tabernacle and the priesthood are read as patterns of God’s coming.
  4. Early practice. What the apostles did, above all in baptism, is the first commentary on what Jesus commanded.
  5. The counter-case. Each contested text gets the Trinitarian reading first, in its own terms.
  6. Scripture interprets Scripture, quoted from the King James Version.

Old Testament foundations

The Old Testament gives two lines of testimony that meet in Jesus: the LORD is God alone, and this same God promises to come. For a fuller map, see YHWH in the Flesh.

: the child who is the mighty God

Isaiah 9:6 · KJV

For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace.

Isaiah spoke when Syria and Israel marched against Ahaz (; ), and he promised a son of David whose government would have no end (). The child’s fivefold name is פֶּלֶא יוֹעֵץ אֵל גִּבּוֹר אֲבִיעַד שַׂר־שָׁלוֹם.

The names of Isaiah 9:6 (9:5 in the Hebrew Bible)
HebrewKJVStrong’sNote
פֶּלֶא (pele) (pele)WonderfulH6382“Wonder.” The angel of uses the same root for his name.
יוֹעֵץ (yoʿets) (yoʿets)CounsellorH3289The LORD “is wonderful in counsel” ().
אֵל גִּבּוֹר (el gibbor) (el gibbor)The mighty GodH410, H1368The same title names the LORD in .
אֲבִיעַד (avi-ʿad) (avi-ʿad)The everlasting FatherH1, H5703“Father of eternity,” one word in the Hebrew.
שַׂר־שָׁלוֹם (sar-shalom) (sar-shalom)The Prince of PeaceH8269, H7965His peace has no end ().

Isaiah sets the title’s weight himself. One chapter later he uses the identical phrase of the LORD: “The remnant shall return... unto the mighty God” (). The child bears the name of the God to whom Israel returns.

Trinitarian theology reserves “Father” for the first person, yet Isaiah gives “Father of eternity” to the son who is born, and elsewhere says, “thou, O LORD, art our father, our redeemer; thy name is from everlasting” (). The simplest reading is that the child is the everlasting Father come in flesh: “he that hath seen me hath seen the Father” ().

The objection, at full strength

The Trinitarian reading of Isaiah 9:6

Trinitarians agree that the child is “the mighty God”; for them the verse proves the Son’s deity. They read “everlasting Father” as an idiom: to be a “father to” a people is to protect and govern them, as Eliakim was “a father to the inhabitants of Jerusalem” (). The Messiah is an eternal father to his people, not the first person. Some Jewish interpreters read the names as a sentence about God, since the Hebrew verb (“and he called”) is active.

The answer

The idiom explains what kind of father the Messiah is; it does not remove the title. And the same verse calls him “the mighty God” in the words of . If there is one mighty God and the child is he, the child is not a second divine person beside the Father. The full study takes up the grammar.

The LORD alone: creator, saviour, shepherd

The Old Testament reserves several works for the LORD alone. The New Testament gives each of them to Jesus.

What the LORD does alone, and who does it in the New Testament
ClaimOld TestamentHebrewNew Testament
Creates alone“stretcheth forth the heavens alone” ()נֹטֶה שָׁמַיִם לְבַדִּי (noteh shamayim levaddi) (noteh shamayim levaddi)“All things were made by him” (; )
Saves alone“beside me there is no saviour” (; )וְאֵין מִבַּלְעָדַי מוֹשִׁיעַ (veʾen mibbalʿaday moshiaʿ)“by me if any man enter in, he shall be saved” (; )
Shepherds his flock“The LORD is my shepherd” (; )יְהוָה רֹעִי (YHWH roʿi) (YHWH roʿi)“I am the good shepherd” ()
First and last“I am the first, and I am the last” ()אֲנִי רִאשׁוֹן וַאֲנִי אַחֲרוֹן (ani rishon vaʾani aharon)“I am the first and the last” ()

Either Jesus took what belongs to the LORD alone, or he is the LORD. Oneness theology draws the second conclusion all the way: the one who says “by myself” is not one of three co-creators but the one God, who made all things by his Word and later came in flesh.

The objection, at full strength

Shared works, distinct persons

Trinitarians take these parallels as proof that Jesus is fully God, not that he is the Father: the Son shares the divine name and works with the Father. God made the worlds “by” his Son (), which sounds like two agents, and in Ezekiel God shepherds through “my servant David” ().

The answer

“Alone” and “by myself” leave no room for a second agent. Oneness writers read as God creating by his own Word, with the Son already in his plan (). Ezekiel promises both “I, even I” and “my servant David,” and Jesus is the one person in whom both are true. And where YHWH is taken to name the whole triune God, as many Trinitarian writers take it, Jesus as YHWH in person holds the whole Godhead (), not a third of it.

: Immanuel

Isaiah 7:14 · KJV

Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign; Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel.

The sign is given by “the Lord himself” (אֲדֹנָי הוּא (Adonai hu) (Adonai hu)), and the child’s name is עִמָּנוּ אֵל (ʿImmanu El) (ʿImmanu El), “God with us” ().

The name says who is present in the child: God. If in him “dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily” (), the one with us is the one God, not one of three persons sent by the other two. Jesus said as much: “the Father that dwelleth in me, he doeth the works” ().

: THE LORD OUR RIGHTEOUSNESS

Jeremiah 23:5–6 · KJV

5Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will raise unto David a righteous Branch, and a King shall reign and prosper, and shall execute judgment and justice in the earth. 6In his days Judah shall be saved, and Israel shall dwell safely: and this is his name whereby he shall be called, THE LORD OUR RIGHTEOUSNESS.

The LORD promises David a “righteous Branch” (צֶמַח צַדִּיק (tsemah tsaddiq) (tsemah tsaddiq)) and names him יְהוָה צִדְקֵנוּ (YHWH tsidqenu) (YHWH tsidqenu), “THE LORD OUR RIGHTEOUSNESS.” Oneness theology reads not two LORDs but one, who raises up David’s son and is himself the righteousness revealed in him: Christ “is made unto us... righteousness” ().

The objection, at full strength

A name can be a confession

Jeremiah gives the same name to Jerusalem (). A city is not God, so the name may be a confession, “the LORD is our righteousness,” like the many Israelite names built on the divine name.

The answer

A fair caution, and the case does not rest on this name alone. Its force is convergence: the same prophets give the Messiah titles that belong only to God, “the mighty God” () and “God with us” ().

: the Son begotten “this day”

Psalms 2:7 · KJV

I will declare the decree: the LORD hath said unto me, Thou art my Son; this day have I begotten thee.

The begetting is tied to a day, and the New Testament places that day in history: the resurrection (), the Son’s rank above the angels () and his priesthood (). The title belongs to the conception: “that holy thing which shall be born of thee shall be called the Son of God” (). God “sent forth his Son, made of a woman” (), and the Son says, “a body hast thou prepared me” ().

Oneness theology takes this at face value: “Son of God” names a real begetting, God manifested in flesh. The psalm closes, “Blessed are all they that put their trust in him” (). Scripture curses trust in man (), yet the New Testament calls all to trust in Jesus. The Hebrew of “Kiss the Son” is debated, but the psalm binds honour for the Son to refuge in God.

The objection, at full strength

Enthronement, not origin

Trinitarians do not rest eternal generation on . “This day” is the Son’s enthronement, when he was “declared to be the Son of God with power... by the resurrection” (). Eternal sonship rests on texts such as , and on the reasoning that an eternal Father implies an eternal Son.

The answer

Then cannot be claimed for an eternal Son. The texts that speak of the Son’s origin place it in time (; ). “In the bosom of the Father” () describes intimacy, and it is said of the Son who “hath declared him.” That God is eternal does not require a second eternal person to be his Son.

The angel of the LORD: and 32, , Judges 13

In several Old Testament appearances of God, “the angel of the LORD” (מַלְאַךְ יְהוָה (malʾakh YHWH) (malʾakh YHWH); H4397) speaks as God, and those who meet him say they have seen God.

The appearances at a glance
PassageWho appearedWhat the text saysHebrewThe response
The angel of the LORD, to HagarHe promises, “I will multiply thy seed” (16:10).אַתָּה אֵל רֳאִי (attah El Roi) (attah El Roi)She names “the LORD that spake unto her” (16:13).
“The LORD,” with two angelsThe LORD appears (18:1); the two go on to Sodom (18:22; 19:1).וַיֵּרָא אֵלָיו יְהוָה (vayyera elav YHWH) (vayyera elav YHWH)Abraham stands “before the LORD” (18:22).
“A man,” who wrestles JacobHosea calls him “the angel” and “the LORD God of hosts” ().פְּנִיאֵל (Peniel) (Peniel)“I have seen God face to face” (32:30).
The angel of the LORD, in the bush“God called unto him out of the midst of the bush” (3:4).אֶהְיֶה אֲשֶׁר אֶהְיֶה (ehyeh asher ehyeh) (ehyeh asher ehyeh)Moses is “afraid to look upon God” (3:6).
The angel of the LORD, to ManoahHis name is “secret,” literally “wonderful” (13:18).פֶלִאי (peli) (peli)“We have seen God” (13:22).

In each account one figure speaks as God. says “the LORD” appeared, and his two companions are angels (): one God and two angels, not three divine persons. The angel of Judges 13 names himself with the root of Isaiah’s “Wonderful,” and the angel of bears God’s own name ().

Oneness theology reads these as temporary, visible manifestations of the one God, anticipating his permanent manifestation in Jesus (). Oneness writers avoid calling them appearances of “the pre-incarnate Son,” since the Son is God incarnate; they are the same God who later came in flesh, whose day Abraham “saw” ()1.

The objection, at full strength

The angel as the Son before Bethlehem

Since the second century many Christians have read the angel as the Son before his incarnation: God, yet distinct from the God who sends him (). Justin Martyr argued that one visitor at Mamre was “another God and Lord” under the Maker of all things6.

The answer

Justin’s wording shows the cost: a second God “subject to” the Maker, language that Nicene orthodoxy later left behind. The text calls the one at Mamre “the LORD,” and the sent angel bears God’s own name (). Justin also reports others who held the power that appeared to be “indivisible and inseparable from the Father, just as... the light of the sun on earth is indivisible and inseparable from the sun in the heavens” (Dialogue 128)6. He opposed them, but they show that a Oneness reading of the theophanies is not new.

: goings forth from everlasting

Micah 5:2 · KJV

But thou, Beth-lehem Ephratah, though thou be little among the thousands of Judah, yet out of thee shall he come forth unto me that is to be ruler in Israel; whose goings forth have been from of old, from everlasting.

The Bethlehem ruler () is one וּמוֹצָאֹתָיו מִקֶּדֶם מִימֵי עוֹלָם (u-motsaʾotav miqqedem mimei ʿolam), “whose goings forth have been from of old, from everlasting” (motsaʾah, H4163). He is born in Bethlehem, but his origins reach into eternity, because the one born there is the eternal God. The eternity belongs to his deity; his sonship begins at Bethlehem.

The objection, at full strength

Ancient, or eternal?

The phrase can mean “from ancient days”: Micah uses nearly the same words, כִּימֵי עוֹלָם (kimei ʿolam) (kimei ʿolam), for Israel’s past (). Many read the verse as the ancient origin of David’s line. Trinitarians who read it as eternity see the Son’s eternal generation.

The answer

Neither reading yields an eternal second person. “Ancient days” speaks of David’s line; “from everlasting” speaks of the eternal God who came forth in Bethlehem. The text says nothing of one divine person generating another.

: one like the Son of man

Daniel 7:13–14 · KJV

13I saw in the night visions, and, behold, one like the Son of man came with the clouds of heaven, and came to the Ancient of days, and they brought him near before him. 14And there was given him dominion, and glory, and a kingdom, that all people, nations, and languages, should serve him: his dominion is an everlasting dominion, which shall not pass away, and his kingdom that which shall not be destroyed.

In Daniel’s Aramaic vision one “like the Son of man” comes to the “Ancient of days” (עַתִּיק יוֹמִין (ʿattiq yomin) (ʿattiq yomin), ) and receives “an everlasting dominion.” Jesus claimed the vision () and, risen, said, “All power is given unto me” ().

Revelation then shows “one like unto the Son of man” whose “hairs were white like wool, as white as snow” (), the features Daniel gave the Ancient of days (). The one who says “I am the first and the last” () bears the marks of both figures.

The objection, at full strength

Two figures in the vision

Daniel sees two figures, one of whom approaches the other and is presented before him. Trinitarians see here a distinction within the divine realm that Oneness theology cannot absorb: one divine figure gives the kingdom and another receives it.

The answer

It is a symbolic vision in which beasts are kings (), like the Lamb taking the book from the one on the throne (). A human figure receives dominion, which is what the Messiah’s humanity received. Oneness affirms a real distinction between God and the man Christ Jesus, not between two divine persons, and Revelation puts the Ancient of days’ features on the Son of man.

The Old Testament witness at a glance

Old Testament foundations and their fulfilment
ThemeTextHebrewFulfilmentOneness reading
The one God; יְהוָה אֶחָד (YHWH echad) (YHWH echad)One God, not three persons
The child is Godאֵל גִּבּוֹר (el gibbor) (el gibbor); The child is the mighty God
Father of eternityאֲבִיעַד (avi-ʿad) (avi-ʿad)The Father’s title on the son
God with usעִמָּנוּ אֵל (ʿImmanu El) (ʿImmanu El)God present in the child
The LORD our righteousnessיְהוָה צִדְקֵנוּ (YHWH tsidqenu) (YHWH tsidqenu)The divine name on David’s Branch
The begotten Sonבְּנִי אַתָּה (beni attah) (beni attah); Sonship dated to a day
God appearing; 18; 32; ; Judg 13מַלְאַךְ יְהוָה (malʾakh YHWH) (malʾakh YHWH)One God, visibly manifest
Origins from everlastingמִימֵי עוֹלָם (mimei ʿolam) (mimei ʿolam)The eternal God born in Bethlehem
Everlasting dominionכְּבַר אֱנָשׁ (kevar ʾenash) (kevar ʾenash)The Son of man bears the Ancient of days’ features

The Old Testament never presents three divine persons. It presents one God, alone, who promises to come himself.

New Testament foundations

The New Testament announces that the promise was kept: the Word who was God became flesh, and the titles reserved for the LORD are given to Jesus.

: the Word made flesh

John 1:1 · KJV

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

John 1:14 · KJV

And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.

John 1:1 and 1:14, phrase by phrase
GreekKJVNote
Ἐν ἀρχῇ ἦν (en archē ēn) (en archē ēn)In the beginning wasEchoes : the Word already was.
ὁ λόγος (ho logos) (ho logos)the WordGod’s self-expression ().
ἦν πρὸς τὸν θεόν (ēn pros ton theon) (ēn pros ton theon)was with Godπρός (pros) (pros): “with, toward, in relation to.”
θεὸς ἦν ὁ λόγος (theos ēn ho logos) (theos ēn ho logos)the Word was Godθεός (theos) (theos) first, without the article: what God is, the Word was.
ὁ λόγος σὰρξ ἐγένετο (ho logos sarx egeneto) (ho logos sarx egeneto)the Word was made fleshThe incarnation.
ἐσκήνωσεν ἐν ἡμῖν (eskēnōsen en hēmin) (eskēnōsen en hēmin)dwelt among usLiterally “tabernacled” (G4637).

The Word is not a second person, any more than a man’s word is a second person beside him. It is God’s own thought and self-expression: “with God” as a plan is with its author, and “God” because it is God’s own. Redemption was in God’s mind “before the foundation of the world” (), and in the fulness of time the Word was made flesh. This follows David K. Bernard’s exposition of 1.

John wrote into a world that knew the term. Philo of Alexandria called the Logos God’s “firstborn” and the eldest of the angels7, a lesser being between God and the world. John is sharper: the Word was God and became flesh (), and the Son “hath declared” the unseen Father ().

The objection, at full strength

“With God” and “was God”

For Trinitarians shows distinction within unity: “with God” sets the Word apart from the Father, and “was God” gives him the divine nature. The anarthrous θεός (theos) (theos) is qualitative: the Word has all that God has without being the same person as τὸν θεόν (ton theon) (ton theon)8. Compare “that eternal life, which was with the Father” ().

The answer

favours Oneness: the life “with the Father” is not a second person but God’s own life, “manifested unto us.” John distinguishes God from his self-expression, not one person from another. And the qualitative reading, pressed consistently, says that everything God is, the Word was, and the Word became a man.

: all the fulness, bodily

Colossians 2:8–9 · KJV

8Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ. 9For in him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily.

Paul first warns against “philosophy and vain deceit” (), then says where God is found: ἐν αὐτῷ κατοικεῖ πᾶν τὸ πλήρωμα τῆς θεότητος σωματικῶς (en autō katoikei pan to plērōma tēs theotētos sōmatikōs).

If all the fulness of deity dwells bodily in Jesus, there is no deity outside him to be a second or third person. Jesus put it his own way: “the Father that dwelleth in me, he doeth the works” ().

The objection, at full strength

The whole nature, not every person

Trinitarians read the verse as the complete divine nature dwelling in the incarnate Son, which is what the Nicene “of one substance” affirms. It does not say all three persons dwell in him; each person has the whole nature.

The answer

The verse does not mention persons. It places the whole Godhead, bodily, in Christ, and with it gives the Oneness picture: the Father in the Son. Three persons each wholly possessing one nature is a theory brought to the text.

: the express image of his person

Hebrews 1:3 · KJV

Who being the brightness of his glory, and the express image of his person, and upholding all things by the word of his power, when he had by himself purged our sins, sat down on the right hand of the Majesty on high;

The Son is ἀπαύγασμα τῆς δόξης καὶ χαρακτὴρ τῆς ὑποστάσεως αὐτοῦ (apaugasma tēs doxēs kai charaktēr tēs hypostaseōs autou): the radiance of God’s glory and the exact impress of his being.

The Son is the visible image of the invisible God (). History adds a footnote: the Creed of Nicaea (325) still treated ὑπόστασις (hypostasis) (hypostasis) and οὐσία (ousia) (ousia) as synonyms, condemning anyone who said the Son was “of another hypostasis or substance” than the Father9. Talk of three hypostases came later in the fourth century. Hebrews knows one.

The objection, at full strength

The image is not the original

Trinitarians answer that ὑπόστασις (hypostasis) (hypostasis) here means nature, not the later “person,” so the verse does not count persons. A stamp is not the seal that made it, and the Son sits “on the right hand of the Majesty on high,” a picture of two.

The answer

Oneness affirms the distinction between image and original: God invisible and God manifested in flesh. Hebrews does not give God a second hypostasis. The “right hand” is the language of power (; “the right hand of power,” ), and it describes the exalted man Christ Jesus, not a second divine person.

and 14:9: “I and my Father are one”

John 10:30–33 · KJV

30I and my Father are one. 31Then the Jews took up stones again to stone him. 32Jesus answered them, Many good works have I shewed you from my Father; for which of those works do ye stone me? 33The Jews answered him, saying, For a good work we stone thee not; but for blasphemy; and because that thou, being a man, makest thyself God.

John 14:9–10 · KJV

9Jesus saith unto him, Have I been so long time with you, and yet hast thou not known me, Philip? he that hath seen me hath seen the Father; and how sayest thou then, Shew us the Father? 10Believest thou not that I am in the Father, and the Father in me? the words that I speak unto you I speak not of myself: but the Father that dwelleth in me, he doeth the works.

reads ἐγὼ καὶ ὁ πατὴρ ἕν ἐσμεν (egō kai ho patēr hen esmen) (egō kai ho patēr hen esmen); reads ὁ ἑωρακὼς ἐμὲ ἑώρακεν τὸν πατέρα (ho heōrakōs eme heōraken ton patera).

In Jesus is the door by whom men are “saved” (10:9) and the good shepherd (10:11), though the LORD alone is saviour and shepherd (; ). His hearers understood 10:30: “thou, being a man, makest thyself God” (10:33). He added, “the Father is in me, and I in him” (10:38), and later told Philip, “the Father that dwelleth in me, he doeth the works” (14:10).

The objection, at full strength

“One thing,” and “we are”

The neuter and the plural have been pressed against Oneness since Tertullian answered Praxeas: one thing, not one person10. Jesus prays that the disciples “may be one, as we are” (), a unity of fellowship, not identity. And seeing the Father in 14:9 means seeing him perfectly revealed in the Son.

The answer

The case does not hang on ἕν (hen) (hen). “We” is natural on the lips of a real man in whom God dwells (). No disciple indwells another as the Father indwells the Son, and no one who sees Peter has seen John. The Father dwelling in him, seen in him and working through him is what Oneness means by God manifested in flesh.

The Comforter: “I will come to you”

John 14:16–18 · KJV

16And I will pray the Father, and he shall give you another Comforter, that he may abide with you for ever; 17Even the Spirit of truth; whom the world cannot receive, because it seeth him not, neither knoweth him: but ye know him; for he dwelleth with you, and shall be in you. 18I will not leave you comfortless: I will come to you.

Jesus promises “another Comforter” (ἄλλον παράκλητον (allon paraklēton) (allon paraklēton)), who “dwelleth with you, and shall be in you,” then says, “I will come to you” () and “I in you” (14:20). The Father sends the Comforter “in my name” (14:26); Jesus sends him too (16:7). “The Lord is that Spirit” (), and “the Spirit of God” is “the Spirit of Christ” ().

The Holy Spirit is the one God, the Spirit of the Father and of Christ, dwelling in his people. The one who was with the disciples in flesh would be in them by the Spirit; “another” marks a new mode of presence, not a third person.

The objection, at full strength

Another of the same kind

ἄλλος (allos) (allos) usually means another of the same kind, distinct from Jesus. The Spirit is sent, “shall not speak of himself” () and takes a masculine pronoun. These are marks of a distinct person.

The answer

John joins what the objection separates: “shall be in you,” “I will come to you,” “I in you” (14:17–20). The senders are one God (15:26). The masculine pronoun follows the gender of παράκλητος (paraklētos) (paraklētos), a title also given to Jesus (). The Spirit is Christ’s own presence in his church.

Titles of Jesus: God, Lord, Saviour, Alpha and Omega

The New Testament gives Jesus the LORD’s own titles.

Divine titles given to Jesus
TextGreekTitleOld Testament backgroundOneness reading
θεὸς ἦν ὁ λόγος (theos ēn ho logos) (theos ēn ho logos)God; the Word; God’s own Word, made flesh
ὁ ὢν ἐπὶ πάντων θεὸς εὐλογητός (ho ōn epi pantōn theos eulogētos)God over all, blessed for everThe Christ “concerning the flesh” is God over all
κύριος Ἰησοῦς Χριστός (kyrios Iēsous Christos) (kyrios Iēsous Christos)LordThe homage the LORD claims for himself is given at the name of Jesus
τοῦ μεγάλου θεοῦ καὶ σωτῆρος ἡμῶν Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ (tou megalou theou kai sōtēros hēmōn Iēsou Christou)Great God and SaviourThere is one Saviour, and he is Jesus
τὸ ἄλφα καὶ τὸ ὦ (to alpha kai to ō) (to alpha kai to ō)Alpha and OmegaThe LORD’s “first and last” on Jesus’ lips
θεὸς ἐφανερώθη ἐν σαρκί (theos ephanerōthē en sarki) (theos ephanerōthē en sarki)God manifest in the fleshThe mystery of godliness

God (). The King James punctuation reads “Christ... who is over all, God blessed for ever,” as many interpreters, ancient and modern, do; some editors punctuate a separate blessing of God11.

Lord (). Paul applies the LORD’s oath, “unto me every knee shall bow” (), to “the name of Jesus.”

Saviour (). One article governs “the great God and our Saviour.” Under the Granville Sharp rule most grammarians read one person: Jesus Christ is the great God and Saviour8. Titus alternates “God our Saviour” (2:10) and “Jesus Christ our Saviour” (3:6), and Isaiah says, “beside me there is no saviour” ().

Alpha and Omega (). The Almighty speaks in 1:8; the one who “was dead” says “I am the first and the last” (1:17–18); and the titles return with “I Jesus” (22:13, 16). Compare .

God manifest in the flesh (). The King James “God” follows most later manuscripts; many early ones read “who” (ὅς (hos) (hos))11. Either way the one manifested is Christ, and the case does not need the variant.

The objection, at full strength

Deity is not identity

Trinitarians affirm all these titles; they prove that Jesus is God, not that he is the Father. ends “to the glory of God the Father,” and Titus opens with “God the Father and the Lord Jesus Christ” ().

The answer

On deity we agree; the question is how many divine persons there are. These are the LORD’s exclusive titles, and “there is none else” () leaves no second person to share them. The distinction between Jesus and “God the Father” is between God in flesh and God in his transcendence.

Typology: the angel, the tabernacle, the priesthood

Three patterns in Israel’s worship show how God is present with his people, and each is fulfilled in Christ.

The angel who bears the name

Exodus 23:20–21 · KJV

20Behold, I send an Angel before thee, to keep thee in the way, and to bring thee into the place which I have prepared. 21Beware of him, and obey his voice, provoke him not; for he will not pardon your transgressions: for my name is in him.

The appearances above form a pattern: God visibly present, bearing his name, for a time. It is fulfilled when God comes permanently in a body: “I am come in my Father’s name” ().

The tabernacle: God dwelling among his people

Exodus 25:8 · KJV

And let them make me a sanctuary; that I may dwell among them.

The Hebrew is וְעָשׂוּ לִי מִקְדָּשׁ וְשָׁכַנְתִּי בְּתוֹכָם (veʿasu li miqdash veshakhanti betokham): God himself will dwell among them.

At its centre was the mercy seat, כַּפֹּרֶת (kapporet) (kapporet), where God would “commune with thee” (). The Septuagint calls it ἱλαστήριον (hilastērion) (hilastērion)5, as Hebrews does (), and Paul uses the word of Christ, “a propitiation” (). Jesus called his body a temple (). The tabernacle was God living among his people; Christ is God living among them in flesh.

The priesthood and the Day of Atonement

Hebrews 9:11–12 · KJV

11But Christ being come an high priest of good things to come, by a greater and more perfect tabernacle, not made with hands, that is to say, not of this building; 12Neither by the blood of goats and calves, but by his own blood he entered in once into the holy place, having obtained eternal redemption for us.

Once a year the high priest went “within the vail before the mercy seat,” where God would “appear in the cloud” (), to make atonement (16:30). Christ entered “by his own blood” () and “through the eternal Spirit offered himself” (9:14), a high priest “taken from among men” (5:1) who prayed “in the days of his flesh” (5:7). He is also “our passover” ().

Both halves of the pattern meet in one person. Priest and sacrifice are “the man Christ Jesus” (); the God who provides the atonement “was in Christ, reconciling the world unto himself” (). “God will provide himself a lamb” (), and the church is his, “purchased with his own blood” ().

The objection, at full strength

A mediator needs two parties

“A mediator is not a mediator of one” (). A priest offers to another, so the Son who offers must be distinct from the Father who receives.

The answer

Paul ends the sentence, “but God is one.” The mediator is “the man Christ Jesus,” and the parties are God and humanity, united in him. His priesthood belongs to his humanity, “taken from among men” ().

Old Testament types fulfilled in Christ
TypeOld TestamentWhat it showedFulfilmentOneness reading
The angel of the LORD; 18; 32; ; Judg 13God visibly present, bearing his nameTemporary manifestations, made permanent in the incarnation
The tabernacleGod dwelling among IsraelGod tabernacled in flesh
The mercy seatWhere God met IsraelChrist, the meeting place of God and man
The Passover lambBlood that turned judgment awayGod provided himself a lamb
The sacrifices; A substitute bearing sinOne sacrifice for ever
The high priest; A mediator from among menThe man Christ Jesus mediates

Baptism and early practice

The name the apostles preached is the name they invoked in baptism. See also The Name in the Water and the Academy path The New Birth.

The Acts record

Acts 2:38 · KJV

Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.

Luke’s commission says that “remission of sins should be preached in his name among all nations, beginning at Jerusalem” (), and Acts begins there (). Samaria (8:16), Cornelius’ house (10:48) and Ephesus (19:5) follow; in Samaria and at Ephesus the Spirit was received after baptism in the name of the Lord Jesus (8:17; 19:6). Paul was told to be baptized “calling on the name of the Lord” (22:16), and he asked, “were ye baptized in the name of Paul?” (). James speaks of “that worthy name by the which ye are called” ().

Baptism “in the name”: the Greek phrases
TextGreekKJVNote
εἰς τὸ ὄνομα τοῦ πατρὸς καὶ τοῦ υἱοῦ καὶ τοῦ ἁγίου πνεύματος (eis to onoma tou patros kai tou huiou kai tou hagiou pneumatos)in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy GhostOne “name,” singular
ἐπὶ τῷ ὀνόματι αὐτοῦ (epi tō onomati autou) (epi tō onomati autou)in his name“beginning at Jerusalem”
ἐπὶ τῷ ὀνόματι Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ (epi tō onomati Iēsou Christou) (epi tō onomati Iēsou Christou)in the name of Jesus ChristTextus Receptus; some critical editions read ἐν (en) (en)
εἰς τὸ ὄνομα τοῦ κυρίου Ἰησοῦ (eis to onoma tou kyriou Iēsou)in the name of the Lord Jesus“Into the name,” as in
ἐν τῷ ὀνόματι τοῦ κυρίου (en tō onomati tou kyriou) (en tō onomati tou kyriou)in the name of the LordCritical editions read Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ (Iēsou Christou) (Iēsou Christou)
εἰς τὸ ὄνομα τοῦ κυρίου Ἰησοῦ (eis to onoma tou kyriou Iēsou)in the name of the Lord JesusJohn’s disciples, baptized again

The apostles who heard obeyed it by invoking the name of Jesus. The singular “name” of Father, Son and Holy Ghost is Jesus: the Son came in his Father’s name (), the Father sends the Spirit in Jesus’ name (), and there is “none other name” for salvation ().

The objection, at full strength

The Lord’s own words

is Jesus’ own command, and it names three; the singular “name” is one name shared by three persons. The varied prepositions suggest that Luke describes the kind of baptism, by Jesus’ authority, rather than the words spoken. The Didache prescribes the threefold words12, and Justin Martyr describes a threefold naming13.

The answer

Acts never records the threefold words, and every account names Jesus; and point to a name invoked over the candidate. The Didache itself speaks of those “baptized into the name of the Lord” (9.5)12. In the third century Cyprian had to answer defenders of baptism in the name of Jesus Christ, who appealed to Peter at Pentecost14, and Aquinas granted that “in the primitive Church the apostles baptized in the name of Christ”15. The command names the titles; the apostles named the name.

An integrative framework

The lines converge. Prophecy said God would come; theophany and tabernacle showed him present for a time; the incarnation made that presence permanent; and the apostles named the one who came.

  1. One God. “The LORD our God is one LORD” (; ).
  2. The Father is the one God in transcendence and fatherhood ().
  3. The Son is the one God manifested in flesh, begotten in time (; ).
  4. The Holy Spirit is the one God indwelling, the Spirit of the Father and of Christ ().
  5. Jesus is where the three meet: all the fulness of the Godhead bodily (), and the name of ().
  6. Prophecy and type are fulfilled in God’s own coming.
  7. Practice follows doctrine: baptism, healing and prayer in Jesus’ name (; ).
  8. The Father–Son distinction is real, but it lies between deity and humanity in Jesus, not between two divine persons (; ).

Oneness reading

  • God is one, and one person.
  • The Son is God manifested in flesh, begotten at the incarnation.
  • The Holy Spirit is the one God’s own Spirit, in action and indwelling.
  • Jesus prays as a man to God; the distinction is humanity and deity.
  • The theophanies are the one God appearing.
  • Baptism is in the name of Jesus Christ.

Trinitarian reading

  • God is one being in three co-equal, co-eternal persons.
  • The Son is the eternally begotten second person, who became incarnate.
  • The Holy Spirit is the third person, distinct from Father and Son.
  • Jesus’ prayers are the Son speaking to the Father, person to person.
  • The theophanies are often read as appearances of the Son before Bethlehem.
  • Baptism uses the threefold words of .

The objection, at full strength

Who was he praying to?

The strongest objection is personal. Jesus prayed, spoke of the Father as another, said “not my will, but thine,” and was sent. If Father and Son are one person, the prayers become theatre.

The answer

The prayers were real because the humanity was real. “In the days of his flesh” Jesus prayed “unto him that was able to save him” (), as a true man prays to God. Ten Objections to Oneness, Answered takes this and nine other objections in full.

Scripture index

Hebrew numbering differs for (9:5), (5:1) and (32:31). The Greek follows the Textus Receptus where it differs from critical editions.

Old Testament index
TextHebrewKJVFulfilment
שְׁמַע יִשְׂרָאֵל יְהוָה אֱלֹהֵינוּ יְהוָה אֶחָד (shemaʿ yisraʾel YHWH elohenu YHWH echad)Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God is one LORD
אַתָּה אֵל רֳאִי (attah El Roi) (attah El Roi)Thou God seest me
וַיֵּרָא אֵלָיו יְהוָה (vayyera elav YHWH) (vayyera elav YHWH)And the LORD appeared unto him
רָאִיתִי אֱלֹהִים פָּנִים אֶל־פָּנִים (raʾiti elohim panim el-panim)I have seen God face to face
אֶהְיֶה אֲשֶׁר אֶהְיֶה (ehyeh asher ehyeh) (ehyeh asher ehyeh)I AM THAT I AM
כִּי שְׁמִי בְּקִרְבּוֹ (ki shemi beqirbo) (ki shemi beqirbo)for my name is in him
וְשָׁכַנְתִּי בְּתוֹכָם (veshakhanti betokham) (veshakhanti betokham)that I may dwell among them
וְהוּא־פֶלִאי (vehu peli) (vehu peli)seeing it is secret
בְּנִי אַתָּה אֲנִי הַיּוֹם יְלִדְתִּיךָ (beni attah ani hayyom yelidtikha)Thou art my Son; this day have I begotten thee
יְהוָה רֹעִי (YHWH roʿi) (YHWH roʿi)The LORD is my shepherd
עִמָּנוּ אֵל (ʿImmanu El) (ʿImmanu El)Immanuel
אֵל גִּבּוֹר אֲבִיעַד (el gibbor avi-ʿad) (el gibbor avi-ʿad)The mighty God, The everlasting Father
אֶל־אֵל גִּבּוֹר (el-el gibbor) (el-el gibbor)unto the mighty God
וְאֵין מִבַּלְעָדַי מוֹשִׁיעַ (veʾen mibbalʿaday moshiaʿ)beside me there is no saviour
אֲנִי רִאשׁוֹן וַאֲנִי אַחֲרוֹן (ani rishon vaʾani aharon)I am the first, and I am the last
נֹטֶה שָׁמַיִם לְבַדִּי (noteh shamayim levaddi) (noteh shamayim levaddi)that stretcheth forth the heavens alone
יְהוָה צִדְקֵנוּ (YHWH tsidqenu) (YHWH tsidqenu)THE LORD OUR RIGHTEOUSNESS
מִקֶּדֶם מִימֵי עוֹלָם (miqqedem mimei ʿolam) (miqqedem mimei ʿolam)from of old, from everlasting
כְּבַר אֱנָשׁ (kevar ʾenash) (kevar ʾenash)one like the Son of man
New Testament index (the other Acts texts are in the baptism table above)
TextGreekKJVOld Testament background
μεθ᾽ ἡμῶν ὁ θεός (meth hēmōn ho theos) (meth hēmōn ho theos)God with us
κύριος εἷς ἐστιν (kyrios heis estin) (kyrios heis estin)is one Lord
καὶ θεὸς ἦν ὁ λόγος (kai theos ēn ho logos) (kai theos ēn ho logos)and the Word was God
ὁ λόγος σὰρξ ἐγένετο (ho logos sarx egeneto) (ho logos sarx egeneto)the Word was made flesh
πρὶν Ἀβραὰμ γενέσθαι ἐγὼ εἰμί (prin Abraam genesthai egō eimi)Before Abraham was, I am
ἐγὼ καὶ ὁ πατὴρ ἕν ἐσμεν (egō kai ho patēr hen esmen) (egō kai ho patēr hen esmen)I and my Father are one
ὁ ἑωρακὼς ἐμὲ ἑώρακεν τὸν πατέρα (ho heōrakōs eme heōraken ton patera)he that hath seen me hath seen the Father
ἔρχομαι πρὸς ὑμᾶς (erchomai pros hymas) (erchomai pros hymas)I will come to you
ἐπὶ τῷ ὀνόματι Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ (epi tō onomati Iēsou Christou) (epi tō onomati Iēsou Christou)in the name of Jesus Christ
θεὸς εὐλογητός (theos eulogētos) (theos eulogētos)God blessed for ever
κύριος Ἰησοῦς Χριστός (kyrios Iēsous Christos) (kyrios Iēsous Christos)Jesus Christ is Lord
τὸ πλήρωμα τῆς θεότητος (to plērōma tēs theotētos) (to plērōma tēs theotētos)the fulness of the Godhead
θεὸς ἐφανερώθη ἐν σαρκί (theos ephanerōthē en sarki) (theos ephanerōthē en sarki)God was manifest in the flesh
τοῦ μεγάλου θεοῦ καὶ σωτῆρος ἡμῶν (tou megalou theou kai sōtēros hēmōn)the great God and our Saviour
χαρακτὴρ τῆς ὑποστάσεως αὐτοῦ (charaktēr tēs hypostaseōs autou)the express image of his person
τὸ ἄλφα καὶ τὸ ὦ (to alpha kai to ō) (to alpha kai to ō)Alpha and Omega

Lexical and historical notes

Two contested words

Historical context

  • The prophets. belongs to the Syro-Ephraimite crisis under Ahaz (; ), about 735–732 BC.
  • John’s Gospel, usually dated to the late first century, addressed readers who knew both the Shema and the Greek Logos.
  • Ignatius of Antioch (c. 110) called Christ “God existing in flesh” and wrote of “God Himself being manifested in human form”16. He also distinguishes Father, Son and Spirit and is not a Oneness writer, but his language sits close to .
  • Justin Martyr (c. 155–160) called the one who appeared to the patriarchs “another God and Lord,” against others who held that power to be inseparable from the Father6.
  • The monarchians (c. 190–220). Noetus taught that Christ was the Father himself17. Tertullian said Praxeas “put to flight the Paraclete, and... crucified the Father,” and admitted that “the simple... who always constitute the majority of believers” were startled by his teaching on the divine “economy”10. Hippolytus reports that Sabellius was excommunicated in Rome under Callistus18. We know these teachers mostly through their opponents, and they are not identical to modern Oneness theology, which attributes Christ’s suffering to his humanity.
  • Nicaea (325) and Constantinople (381). Nicaea called the Son “of one substance” with the Father and still used hypostasis and substance as synonyms9; Constantinople affirmed the Spirit’s deity and completed the creed19. The three-person definition belongs to the fourth century.
  • Baptism after the apostles. The Didache has the threefold words and also speaks of baptism “into the name of the Lord”12; Justin describes a threefold naming13; Cyprian answered defenders of Jesus-name baptism in the 250s14; Aquinas acknowledged apostolic baptism in Christ’s name15.
  • The modern movement took shape after the 1913 Arroyo Seco camp meeting near Los Angeles. Rebaptisms followed from 1914, and after the Assemblies of God adopted a Trinitarian statement in 1916, Oneness ministers organized separately20.

Conclusion and contemporary implications

Summary of findings

The Old Testament presents one God who creates, saves and shepherds alone, and who promises to come as the mighty God, God with us and the LORD our righteousness, appearing meanwhile in visible form under his own name. The New Testament presents the fulfilment: the Word made flesh, all the fulness of the Godhead bodily, God’s one hypostasis exactly expressed, the Father dwelling in the Son, the Spirit as Christ’s own presence, and every exclusive title of the LORD given to Jesus. Tabernacle and priesthood foreshadowed God dwelling with his people and reconciling them, and the apostles baptized in the name of Jesus Christ.

The Trinitarian reading has been stated at its strongest here. It agrees on Christ’s deity, and that agreement matters. The difference is whether the distinctions Scripture draws lie between divine persons or between God and the humanity in which he came. This compendium argues for the second: Father, Son and Holy Spirit are the one God revealed, and his name is Jesus.

Implications for today

  • Doctrine. Say what Scripture says: God is one, and Jesus is that God manifested in flesh. Keep deity and humanity distinct, because most objections turn on that line.
  • Liturgy. Baptism, prayer and worship in Jesus’ name are how the apostles lived the doctrine (; ).
  • Dialogue. Begin with shared ground, the full deity of Christ, and proceed text by text: steelman first, then the text.
  • Devotion. The God who spoke from the bush did not send a deputy. “God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto himself” (). That is cause for worship before it is a point in a debate.

The key

The case in one sentence

The God who said “beside me there is no saviour” was born as the child called “The mighty God, The everlasting Father,” and his name is Jesus.

Written for scholars, Trinitarian readers and Oneness believers alike, this compendium reads Scripture by Scripture and welcomes correction wherever it has misread the text.

Notes

  1. David K. Bernard, The Oneness of God. Hazelwood, MO: Word Aflame Press, 1983; on the Logos, the Old Testament theophanies and the Sonabc
  2. Brown, Driver and Briggs, A Hebrew and English Lexicon of the Old Testament. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1906 (BDB)abcdef
  3. James Strong, The Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible. 1890; Hebrew and Chaldee Dictionary and Greek Dictionary of the New Testamentab
  4. Bauer, Danker, Arndt and Gingrich, A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature. 3rd ed., Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000 (BDAG)abcdefghijk
  5. The Septuagint (LXX). The Greek Old Testament: κύριος for the divine name; παρθένος at Isa 7:14; ἱλαστήριον for the mercy seat at Exod 25:17–22abc
  6. Justin Martyr, Dialogue with Trypho. c. AD 155–160, ch. 56 and 128abc
  7. Philo of Alexandria, On the Confusion of Tongues. First century AD, §146 (the Logos as God’s firstborn and the eldest of the angels)↩
  8. Daniel B. Wallace, Greek Grammar Beyond the Basics. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1996; on the anarthrous θεός of John 1:1 and on the Granville Sharp construction (Titus 2:13)ab
  9. The Creed of Nicaea. AD 325, with its anathemasab
  10. Tertullian, Against Praxeas. c. AD 213, ch. 1, 3 and 22ab
  11. Bruce M. Metzger, A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament. 2nd ed., Stuttgart: United Bible Societies, 1994; notes on Rom 9:5 and 1 Tim 3:16ab
  12. The Didache (Teaching of the Twelve Apostles). Late first or early second century, 7.1–3 and 9.5abc
  13. Justin Martyr, First Apology. c. AD 155, ch. 61ab
  14. Cyprian of Carthage, Letter to Jubaianus. c. AD 256; Epistle 73 in modern numbering (Epistle 72 in the Ante-Nicene Fathers), §16–18ab
  15. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologiae. III, q. 66, a. 6, reply to objection 1ab
  16. Ignatius of Antioch, Letter to the Ephesians. c. AD 110, 7.2 and 19.3↩
  17. Hippolytus, Against Noetus. Early third century, ch. 1↩
  18. Hippolytus, Refutation of All Heresies. Book IX, on Noetus, Callistus and Sabellius↩
  19. The Council of Constantinople. AD 381, and the Niceno-Constantinopolitan Creed↩
  20. David A. Reed, “In Jesus’ Name”: The History and Beliefs of Oneness Pentecostals. Blandford Forum: Deo Publishing, 2008↩

Used in the Academy

Learn this case, step by step

Start the path